Whether the decision of the investigating judge on the cancellation of the attachment of property or on the refusal of such cancellation is subject to appeal

Once again, the Supreme Court and scientists were asked question of which decisions investigating judge are subject to an appeal, not such appeal in course pre-trial investigation. Today, immediate object our research, as well that joint chamber Criminal Cassation part Court, is decision cancel seizure property or refuse it. The positions chambers same, illustrated by Justice dated February 19, 2019. case No. 569/17036/18 (proceedings 51-598kmo19) panel judges First Judicial Chamber CCS March 14, 2023. 760/5570/22 51-3149km22), etc. research aims find out whether this particular it implicit interpretation provisions Art. 174, 309 Procedure Code Ukraine, gives grounds for statement list parts 1 2 Article Ukraine exhaustive extended interpretation. applied formal-logical method, deductive reasoning discursive thinking resulted a scientific conclusion that, during investigation, clearly provided criminal procedural norms included legislator article Ukraine. substantiates situation, preparatory proceedings court, participants have right use opportunities Part 3 With considered legislative state affairs, aware complexity those challenges take place investigation follow from need ensure respect rights its participants, once again called upon hear voice colleagues-proceduralists who, ten years, stating wrong approach constructing other similar norms, call change at least expand list, regulated